Denmark Set to Introduce Tax on Unrealized Crypto Gains in New Legislation
The Tax Law Council of Denmark has proposed a significant shift in the taxation of cryptocurrencies, recommending a bill that could subject unrealized gains and losses of crypto assets held by Danish investors to taxation as early as January 2026. This initiative comes in response to the growing number of Danes investing in cryptocurrencies, with a survey conducted in Spring 2024 indicating that approximately 300,000 individuals own crypto assets.
The proposal aims to integrate non-backed crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC), into Denmark's existing financial taxation framework. The Tax Law Council has outlined three potential models for taxing crypto assets: capital gains tax, warehouse taxation, and inventory taxation.
Tax Minister Rasmus Stoklund emphasized that many Danes have faced significant tax burdens when investing in cryptocurrencies under the current capital gains approach. The inventory taxation model would treat crypto assets similarly to other financial instruments, such as stocks and bonds. This proposed mark-to-market taxation would involve taxing the annual changes in the value of crypto assets, regardless of whether they have been sold. Consequently, owners of crypto assets in Denmark would find themselves liable for taxes on unrealized gains and losses.
According to Mads Eberhardt, a senior crypto analyst at Steno Research, the proposed tax on unrealized capital gains would be set at 42%. This tax model would not only apply to newly acquired crypto assets but also to those obtained as far back as the genesis block of Bitcoin in January 2009. This broad retroactive application raises concerns among investors regarding the potential financial impact of the new tax regime.
The Tax Council's proposal also includes measures to require crypto asset service providers, such as exchanges and payment companies, to report customer transaction information in a manner accessible to all EU countries. This move aims to enhance transparency and compliance within the crypto market.
Before becoming law, the proposals outlined by the Tax Law Council must be considered and voted on by the Danish Parliament. This initiative aligns with a broader trend observed in various jurisdictions seeking to tighten tax regulations on both crypto and traditional financial assets. Denmark's potential move to tax unrealized gains may set a precedent for other countries contemplating similar regulations, reflecting an ongoing effort to integrate cryptocurrencies into formal economic frameworks.
As the landscape of cryptocurrency regulation continues to evolve, the implications of Denmark's proposed legislation could have far-reaching effects on the investment strategies of crypto holders and the overall market dynamics within the European Union.