Home Upload Photo Upload Videos Write a Blog Analytics Messaging Streaming Create Adverts Creators Program
Bebuzee Afghanistan Bebuzee Albania Bebuzee Algeria Bebuzee Andorra Bebuzee Angola Bebuzee Antigua and Barbuda Bebuzee Argentina Bebuzee Armenia Bebuzee Australia Bebuzee Austria Bebuzee Azerbaijan Bebuzee Bahamas Bebuzee Bahrain Bebuzee Bangladesh Bebuzee Barbados Bebuzee Belarus Bebuzee Belgium Bebuzee Belize Bebuzee Benin Bebuzee Bhutan Bebuzee Bolivia Bebuzee Bosnia and Herzegovina Bebuzee Botswana Bebuzee Brazil Bebuzee Brunei Bebuzee Bulgaria Bebuzee Burkina Faso Bebuzee Burundi Bebuzee Cabo Verde Bebuzee Cambodia Bebuzee Cameroon Bebuzee Canada Bebuzee Central African Republic Bebuzee Chad Bebuzee Chile Bebuzee China Bebuzee Colombia Bebuzee Comoros Bebuzee Costa Rica Bebuzee Côte d'Ivoire Bebuzee Croatia Bebuzee Cuba Bebuzee Cyprus Bebuzee Czech Republic Bebuzee Democratic Republic of the Congo Bebuzee Denmark Bebuzee Djibouti Bebuzee Dominica Bebuzee Dominican Republic Bebuzee Ecuador Bebuzee Egypt Bebuzee El Salvador Bebuzee Equatorial Guinea Bebuzee Eritrea Bebuzee Estonia Bebuzee Eswatini Bebuzee Ethiopia Bebuzee Fiji Bebuzee Finland Bebuzee France Bebuzee Gabon Bebuzee Gambia Bebuzee Georgia Bebuzee Germany Bebuzee Ghana Bebuzee Greece Bebuzee Grenada Bebuzee Guatemala Bebuzee Guinea Bebuzee Guinea-Bissau Bebuzee Guyana Bebuzee Haiti Bebuzee Honduras Bebuzee Hong Kong Bebuzee Hungary Bebuzee Iceland Bebuzee India Bebuzee Indonesia Bebuzee Iran Bebuzee Iraq Bebuzee Ireland Bebuzee Israel Bebuzee Italy Bebuzee Jamaica Bebuzee Japan Bebuzee Jordan Bebuzee Kazakhstan Bebuzee Kenya Bebuzee Kiribati Bebuzee Kuwait Bebuzee Kyrgyzstan Bebuzee Laos Bebuzee Latvia Bebuzee Lebanon Bebuzee Lesotho Bebuzee Liberia Bebuzee Libya Bebuzee Liechtenstein Bebuzee Lithuania Bebuzee Luxembourg Bebuzee Madagascar Bebuzee Malawi Bebuzee Malaysia Bebuzee Maldives Bebuzee Mali Bebuzee Malta Bebuzee Marshall Islands Bebuzee Mauritania Bebuzee Mauritius Bebuzee Mexico Bebuzee Micronesia Bebuzee Moldova Bebuzee Monaco Bebuzee Mongolia Bebuzee Montenegro Bebuzee Morocco Bebuzee Mozambique Bebuzee Myanmar Bebuzee Namibia Bebuzee Nauru Bebuzee Nepal Bebuzee Netherlands Bebuzee New Zealand Bebuzee Nicaragua Bebuzee Niger Bebuzee Nigeria Bebuzee North Korea Bebuzee North Macedonia Bebuzee Norway Bebuzee Oman Bebuzee Pakistan Bebuzee Palau Bebuzee Panama Bebuzee Papua New Guinea Bebuzee Paraguay Bebuzee Peru Bebuzee Philippines Bebuzee Poland Bebuzee Portugal Bebuzee Qatar Bebuzee Republic of the Congo Bebuzee Romania Bebuzee Russia Bebuzee Rwanda Bebuzee Saint Kitts and Nevis Bebuzee Saint Lucia Bebuzee Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Bebuzee Samoa Bebuzee San Marino Bebuzee São Tomé and Príncipe Bebuzee Saudi Arabia Bebuzee Senegal Bebuzee Serbia Bebuzee Seychelles Bebuzee Sierra Leone Bebuzee Singapore Bebuzee Slovakia Bebuzee Slovenia Bebuzee Solomon Islands Bebuzee Somalia Bebuzee South Africa Bebuzee South Korea Bebuzee South Sudan Bebuzee Spain Bebuzee Sri Lanka Bebuzee Sudan Bebuzee Suriname Bebuzee Sweden Bebuzee Switzerland Bebuzee Syria Bebuzee Taiwan Bebuzee Tajikistan Bebuzee Tanzania Bebuzee Thailand Bebuzee Timor-Leste Bebuzee Togo Bebuzee Tonga Bebuzee Trinidad and Tobago Bebuzee Tunisia Bebuzee Turkey Bebuzee Turkmenistan Bebuzee Tuvalu Bebuzee Uganda Bebuzee Ukraine Bebuzee United Arab Emirates Bebuzee United Kingdom Bebuzee Uruguay Bebuzee Uzbekistan Bebuzee Vanuatu Bebuzee Venezuela Bebuzee Vietnam Bebuzee World Wide Bebuzee Yemen Bebuzee Zambia Bebuzee Zimbabwe
Blog Image

Law requires MACC to first verify facts before investigating, Gobind says as judge probed following RPK's blog post

Gobind cited Citing Section 29(3) of the Act saying where an officer of the commission has reason to suspect the commission of an offence under this Act following a report made under subsection (1), he shall cause an investigation to be carried out and fo

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) must first verify the facts in a report before it can open an investigation under the MACC Act, DAP lawmaker Gobind Singh Deo said today as the anti-graft body investigates a judge.

Gobind cited Citing Section 29(3) of the Act saying where an officer of the commission has reason to suspect the commission of an offence under this Act following a report made under subsection (1), he shall cause an investigation to be carried out and for such purpose may exercise all the powers of investigation provided for under this Act and the Criminal Procedure Code.

“That provision is there to ensure that complaints have basis before probes are launched against persons named in reports.

“Tan Sri Azam Baki must state whether the commission verified the matters stated in the report against the Judge to begin with.

“If this has not been done, the Judge cannot yet be probed as there is nothing yet to probe as the basis of the complaint has not been established,” said Gobind in a statement.

Gobind who is also DAP’s national deputy chairman, joined civil group G25 in seeking clarification from the MACC on whether it had thoroughly investigated the credibility of the claims made by fugitive blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin before acting against judge Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali.

Gobind also stressed that Azam Baki must respond.

“This is a matter of great public concern and importance as Section 29(3) is clear. It fixes an obligation on the MACC which is an important prerequisite to an investigation against a person. It applies to all reports made under 29(1).

“Was the complaint verified in this case before launching the investigation?” he said.

Nazlan was the High Court judge who had heard former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s trial over the misappropriation of RM42 million of government-owned SRC International Sdn Bhd’s funds, and is now a Court of Appeal judge.

The MACC recently said it had opened investigation papers as a report was officially lodged.

This came after blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin published blog posts against Nazlan.

Nazlan had recently lodged a police report which stated that Raja Petra’s April 20 blog post contained “false, baseless and malicious” allegations intended to interfere with the justice system and judiciary.

The recent online attacks against Nazlan as the SRC trial judge had started appearing more than one and a half years after his July 2020 verdict that found Najib guilty, or in other words just about three months after the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s decision on December 8 last year.

Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said the judiciary was not beyond criticism but the public, including politicians, must not launch baseless attacks against judges and undermine confidence in the courts as part of their agenda. Read More...

 

Previous Post

TV host Derksen quits after admitting sexual abuse incident

Next Post

Western Sahara: Parlacen Applauds Morocco and Spain's Efforts to ‘Put an End to the Sahara Dispute

Comments