What the Ukraine conflict reveals about crypto
Since Russia launched its unprovoked attack on Ukraine in February, crypto has been part of the story. The conflict has shown the world the potential and the limits of blockchain technology, and also posed hard moral questions for the crypto community and its critics.
The latest example comes via Wired’s renowned cybersecurity reporter, Andy Greenberg, whose latest dispatch recounts the challenge of shutting down crypto donations to Russia’s war machine. Greenberg explores how, despite sanctions, crypto continues to trickle to militias and arms dealers, thanks to rogue exchanges in Russia, China, and India. Forensic accounting shows more than $4 million in crypto has poured in, though the actual number is likely much higher.
For crypto haters, this provides further confirmation of their belief that Bitcoin is only useful for scams and crime—no matter that criminal regimes like Russia do a brisk trade in U.S. dollars, gold, and other “respectable” currencies. Meanwhile, tracing the crypto flowing into Russia has produced some unlikely heroes. Those include Binance, which has a reputation for working outside the law, but in the case of the Ukraine conflict has backed an investigative team that’s helped track illegal donations by monitoring Telegram and the blockchain.
The most unexpected, and frankly troubling, element of the Ukraine conflict, however, is the number of prominent figures on crypto Twitter who are acting as apologists for Vladimir Putin’s barbaric war. In some cases, this has come in the form of calling for the West to stop intervening on Ukraine’s side lest Putin unleash nuclear weapons (an argument that’s defensible but also wrong given that appeasing Putin would only embolden him and other dictators to engage in nuclear blackmail). Read More...