Political parties question the timing of Mkhwebane's suspension
-
Loading... - Deborah Waite
- 10 Jun 2022
- 265 Views
- 0 Like
- 0 Comment
The African Transformation Movement (ATM) says this indicates that Ramaphosa is now in panic mode. ATM has lodged a complaint against Ramaphosa with the Public Protector for allegedly breaching the executive code of ethics relating to the alleged theft of 4 million US dollars at Ramaphosa’s Phala Phala farm.
The President has denied any wrongdoing. The Presidency said Mkhwebane would remain suspended until an impeachment process in Parliament has been completed. Impeachment hearings are due to get under next month.
ATM spokesperson Sibusiso Mncwabe believes Ramaphosa’s action reveals what the President is going through.
“It gives us a clear indication that the president of the country is panicking now, from what might be discovered by the public protector. Our leader Vuyo Zungula, wrote to the Public Protector, and we received her letter, that the matter is getting attention and being investigated. Now, we’re receiving the news that she has been suspended. To us, it says the president is panicking because there’s nothing so far that necessitates the president to suspend the Public Protector.”
Action SA leader Herman Mashaba says the timing of the suspension is suspicious.
“The timing of the suspension leaves a lot of suspicion and concern for us as South Africans because this matter of the public protector and the president is something that has been long outstanding. We just cannot understand why the president decides to actually act on the eve of his own investigation by the public protector. The president had the right and opportunity in the past to have acted.
OneSA Movement leader Mmusi Maimane believes that given the politics surrounding the Public Protector and the President, it would have been ideal for an independent voice to decide on the Public Protector’s suspension.
“Given that there’s an investigation into him at this point, given that there’s a history of litigation between the two, whether the president was the most suited to execute the decision to suspend because, at this point in time, it can only be read in political terms, as opposed to legal terms. So, my urgency would have been that an independent voice headed up by the judiciary should be able to decide on whether or not a suspension would be an appropriate action to take.” Read More…
